22වන ව්යවස්ථා සංශෝධනයට එරෙහි පෙත්සමක් මගින් 2015 දී සිදුකරන ලද ව්යවස්ථා වංචාවක් අනාවරණය කිරීම ඇතුලු මෛත්රීපාල සේනානායක නඩු තීන්දුව විවරණය කළ ලිපිය....* *The article explaining the Maithripala Senanayake judgment, which includes the exposure of a constitutional fraud committed in 2015 through a petition against the 22nd Constitutional Amendment. "ෆීනික්ස් නීති සාර සංග්රහය 2026 අගෝස්තු දිගහැරුම" දැන් ලබා ගත හැකිය. https://neethiyalk.blogspot.com/2026/08/22-2015-2026.html?m=1 විමසීම සමායෝජක, වෛද්ය තිලක පද්මා සුබසිංහ අනුස්මරණ නීති අධ්යාපන වැඩසටහන. දුරකථන 0712063394. නීතීඥවරුන් කිහිප දෙනෙකුගේ වැරදි හේතුවෙන් ආණ්ඩුක්රම ව්යවස්ථාවේ 83.ආ, 30.2, 62.2 ව්යවස්ථාවල පරස්පරතා හටගැනීම තුළ 22ට ජනමතවිචාරණයක් ඕනෑ...!නීතීඥවරයෙකු 22ට එරෙහිව ශ්රේෂ්ඨාධිකරණයට පෙත්සමක් ඉදිරිපත් කරයි....* http://neethiyalk.blogspot.com/2026/08/83-302-622-22-22.html?m=1 * A referendum is required for the 22nd Amendment due to contradictions in Articles 83(ආ), 30(2), and 62(2) caused by the mistakes of...
* A referendum is required for the 22nd Amendment due to contradictions in Articles 83(ආ), 30(2), and 62(2) caused by the mistakes of several lawyers! A lawyer files a petition in the Supreme Court against the 22nd Amendment.
* A referendum is required for the 22nd Amendment due to contradictions in Articles 83(ආ), 30(2), and 62(2) caused by the mistakes of several lawyers! A lawyer files a petition in the Supreme Court against the 22nd Amendment. In his petition, Attorney-at-Law Aruna Laksiri Unawatuna has pointed out to the Supreme Court that the failure of lawyers to present proper facts to the Supreme Court during the 19th Amendment to the Constitution in 2015—in accordance with the 1978 Constitution and Article 9 of the 1972 Constitution—is the root cause of the contradictions among Articles 83(ආ), 30(2), and 62(2) of the Constitution. Attorney-at-Law Aruna Laksiri Unawatuna filed a petition in the Supreme Court today (19.08.2026) challenging the 22nd Amendment to the Constitution. He also revealed in his petition that when he filed a fundamental rights petition in 2024 regarding the presidential term of office—concerning the judicial precedent set in 2015 regarding the amendment of Article 70 of...